I have read more than half of Ramayana. It is not for
nothing that it has been raised to epic status in our country. There is
tremendous wealth in every event of it. There are fundamental differences
between Ramayana and Mahabharata. In Mahabharata, there is no one hero and heroine.
But Ramayana comes very close to our general assumption of a story- it has a
hero, Ram- who does all the good things including bashing bad guys and a
heroine, Sita- who is embodiment of all the virtues.
But Mahabharata is different. Here even Yudhistira who is
known for his 'Truth' and 'Dharma', banishes them on the battle field. Arjun
considered a great warrior had to kill Karna, Bhishma and Drona with deception.
Even Krishna- who is called God follows
"unrighteous" ways to help Pandavas win. These characters seem close to
our selves. Pandavas cannot be called good guys and Kauravas bad guys rigidly.
They just had varying degrees of grey qualities. To an extent that I felt pity
for Duryodhana (the cause of the battle and so much bloodshed) after Bhima
kills him. But Ram was white and demons were black in Ramayana. May be people
had evolved after all there are so many years between the 2 epics. The
description of Sita in Ramayana is to my special liking. Ramayana is Ram
through out but in Mahabharata every person gets his/her share.
Mahabharata appears more colourful and happening than
Ramayana. In Ramayana one can easily predict what a particular character's
response will be to a given incident. But in Mahabharata, no. They surprise you
by behaving in exact contrary to their known nature- Arjuna's deception, Krishna 's mavericks, Duryodhana's friendship, Karna's
loyalty, Bhishma's weakness, Drona's love, Draupadi's angst and so on. But in
Ramayana it's impossible for Ram to betray- even his wife's abductors, it's
impossible to Lakshmana to disobey his brother Ram, it's impossible for
Dashratha to admonish his wife's evil asking of sending Ram in exile. Ramayana
is full of love and romance. Dashratha's love for Ram- he even lays his life in
the grief of his separation. Bharata's love for Ram- he even rejects the
throne. Lakshmana's love for Ram- he even goes to exile when none asked for it.
Of course Sita's love for Ram- she being a princess follows him to forest.
Ram's love for his 3 mothers, father, brothers and even demons are sublime.
6 comments:
Where are you reading these two epics from??
And regarding Ram's love to Sita - I dint like it when she had to go for the "agnipravesh" to clarify Ram's suspicion.
Geetha, from what I could understand from reading Ramayana, Ram lived for others and he was conscious of somebody putting a '?' on this quality of his. The issue you have mentioned is a case in point. From what is described in the text, Ram didn't suspect Sita, but just fearing others reaction he asked her to take the test. I am not supporting him, but that was how he was. Please note that I have not asked my readers to follow these epics, but just to read and understand them.
Ya i get it.. I just told my opinion ashte..
Btw where are you reading these epics from?
Why? Don't you get these books in any book stall? Bought them :)
Ha ha :) haagalla.. I meant there are numerous publishers for these epics. I wanted to know the author/publication.
yup......r8..mahabharata has strong hold than ramayana....esply in the battle field,wen it cums to abhiyanyu,karna-arjuna,bheeshma & krishna's role in these teaches us so many tactics of life...
Post a Comment